What size is more suitable for the flat plate direct injection machine
The size of the flat direct injection machine is generally fixed. The common small flat direct injection machines are A3 and 6090, which are suitable for small amount of direct injection printing needs. The common large flat direct injection machines are 1.2 and 1.6 meters. A width, the length is generally 3 meters or 6 meters or even longer, suitable for a large number of direct-injection printing needs. Small flat-panel direct-injection machines such as A3 (30*50cm format), 6090 (60*90cm format), the format has been standardized, don’t think I want to lengthen it or widen it, standardized machines and customized machines The difference is that all parts of the standardized machine can be purchased on a large scale, so the cost is lower. The parts of the non-standard machine are all customized and do not have the conditions for large-scale procurement, so the non-standard machine seems to be a little wider than the standard machine or Longer, the cost is a lot more expensive, so the price is also a lot more expensive, the amount of this money, it is better to directly use a large flat-panel direct injection machine. The common widths of large-scale flat-panel direct injection machines are 1.2 meters and 1.6 meters, so what is the difference between these two widths? The 1.2-meter large flat-panel direct-injection machine has a golden width, and the process of laying and unloading is very convenient. There is no need to bend over. When spreading materials with a width of 1.6 meters, you can put one more row and print larger pieces, so the cost performance is relatively high. , But it’s not as comfortable as 1.2 meters when laying the material, the middle part may have to change waist to be able to. The length of the machine can be determined according to your own situation. The place is big enough, it is recommended to be 6 meters long, and the place is small, just 3 meters, not too long, it does not help the efficiency at all, and the price is higher. , Not cost-effective.